I used onsem's sic mosfet model （NTHL040N120M3S）for double pulse test simulation which will generates large voltage and current, but the simulation results were not satisfactory，just as follows：
This is the schematic diagram I built:
the NTHL040N120M3S model was downloaded from this website ： Case: 00451022 (site.com)
the datasheet download website for this device ：Silicon Carbide (SiC) MOSFETs (onsemi.com)
The corresponding netlist is as follows：
// Design view name: schematic
simulator lang=spectre
global 0
include "/home/student1/PDK/csmc600v/Docs/Spice_Mode/10HVCSDST60V19/10HVCSDST60V19/s10hvcsdst60v19.scs" section=tt_20v
include "/home/student1/model_stage2/NTHL040N120M3S_spectre/NTHL040N120M3S_Rev1.scs"
// Library name: qsliang_sic
// Cell name: NTHL040N120M3S_3P_DPT
// View name: schematic
V10 (net012 GND) vsource dc=18 type=dc
V9 (inv_in GND) vsource dc=0 type=dc
V8 (net011 GND) vsource dc=-5 type=dc
V7 (inv_in GND) vsource dc=0 type=dc
V6 (net014 VD) vsource dc=-5 type=dc
V5 (GND 0) vsource dc=0 type=dc
V0 (net016 GND) vsource dc=800 type=dc
V2 (net6 GND) vsource dc=15 type=dc
V1 (net4 GND) vsource dc=-5 type=dc
M4 (Tj inv_in net011 net011) mn20v m=1 mt=100 w=10u l=1.4u as=12.625p \
ad=80.64p ps=22.725u pd=40u
M0 (Tcase inv_in net4 net4) mn20v m=1 mt=100 w=10u l=1.4u as=12.625p \
ad=80.64p ps=22.725u pd=40u
M3 (net016 net014 VD Tj Tcase) NTHL040N120M3S_5P
M2 (VD VGS GND Tj Tcase) NTHL040N120M3S_5P
M5 (Tj inv_in net012 net012) mp20v m=1 mt=200 w=10u l=1.6u as=12.5625p \
ad=72.8p ps=22.6125u pd=38.4u
M1 (Tcase inv_in net6 net6) mp20v m=1 mt=200 w=10u l=1.6u as=12.5625p \
ad=72.8p ps=22.6125u pd=38.4u
L0 (net016 VD) inductor l=200u
V4 (in GND) vsource dc=0 type=pwl \
file="/home/student1/qsliang/sic/qsliang_sic/doupul.txt"
C0 (net016 GND) capacitor c=660u
R0 (in VGS) resistor r=10.00
simulatorOptions options reltol=1e-3 vabstol=1e-6 iabstol=1e-12 temp=27 \
tnom=27 scalem=1.0 scale=1.0 gmin=1e-12 rforce=1 diagnose=yes \
maxnotes=5 maxwarns=5 digits=5 cols=80 dc_pivot_check=yes pivrel=1e-3 \
sensfile="../psf/sens.output" checklimitdest=psf
tran tran stop=10u errpreset=moderate write="spectre.ic" \
writefinal="spectre.fc" annotate=status maxiters=5
finalTimeOP info what=oppoint where=rawfile
modelParameter info what=models where=rawfile
element info what=inst where=rawfile
outputParameter info what=output where=rawfile
designParamVals info what=parameters where=rawfile
primitives info what=primitives where=rawfile
subckts info what=subckts where=rawfile
save M2:1
saveOptions options save=allpub
The version of spectre I use is 19.1.0.496.isr12 64bit -- 16 Oct 2020
Does' The results calculated by Spectre may be incorrect because the junction current model has been linearized ' mean that the current value is not correct ？
What impact will those "Top 10 Residue Convergence failure counts accumulated from the beginning of `dc gmin stepping' analysis、warnings and notices" have on the simulation results? Do I need to do something to eliminate them?
Additionally, do I need to set "bin-relref=yes, highvoltage=yes" ？ If so, how do I set it ？